Skip to main content
Journals

Reframing Hyaluronidase in Aesthetic Medicine: From “Dissolving Filler” to “Modifying Filler”

Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Authors: Steven Harris, MBBCh, MSc , Steven Weiner, MD

Summary: Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for lip augmentation; however, the safety and performance of injection techniques and instruments (needle vs cannula) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of HA injection techniques for lip augmentation and to assess patient satisfaction, injected volume, and associations with technique, instrument, and HA product.
Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulatory injectable that restores midfacial volume through collagen neogenesis rather than gel-based filling. Controlled clinical evidence directly quantifying PLLA's volumetric efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of a Norberg Medical PLLA formulation for midface rejuvenation in a prospective, evaluator-blinded, split-face controlled study.
Energy-based devices are widely used for facial rejuvenation; as a result, an increasing proportion of patients presenting for facelift or necklift surgery have a history of prior treatment with ultrasound- or radiofrequency-based technologies. While the efficacy and safety of these devices are well established, their cumulative effects on facial soft tissues critical to deep-layer facelift surgery remain under-recognized.
Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used clinically; yet, its temporary effects require repeated injections that increase cost and inconvenience. There is limited rigorous evidence to support claims that repeated BoNT-A use alters efficacy. Unlike peripheral nerve transection, which causes irreversible denervation after 12 to 24 months, the long-term physiological effects of BoNT-A chemodenervation remain unclear.